Skip to content
All topics

AI Agents

Recent items mentioning AI Agents across the Databricks ecosystem — releases, news, videos, and community Q&A. Updated hourly.

60 recent items1 release34 news12 videos13 community threads
What's happening in AI AgentsAI synthesis · updated 2h ago

Databricks is racing to make agents safe and cost-efficient at scale: Omnigent's Contextual Policies block data exfiltration by catching the "lethal trifecta" of private-data access plus untrusted content 5, while its open-source meta-harness adds cost controls and multi-agent routing for coding agents 7. Meanwhile, platform-native agents built on Genie and Unity Catalog are beating general coding agents on accuracy (77% vs. 56–72%) at roughly half the cost, with Abacus Insights cutting client onboarding time by 50% in production 1.

Generated daily from the 10 most recent items mentioning AI Agents. Click any [N] to jump to the source.

Databricks CommunityAdministration & Architecture

Databricks App architecture with AppKit - agentic app with governed write-back functionality

005d ago
Databricks CommunityGenerative AI

Building an Agentic HR Front Door on Databricks

001w ago
HackerNews

2026 State of AI Agents: Enterprise Insights on Building AI

10Anon843w ago
Databricks CommunityTechnical Blog

AgentOps on Databricks: Operating Production AI Agents

003w ago
Databricks CommunityData Engineering

Are enterprises moving from "Data Lakehouse" to "Agentic Lakehouse"?

001mo ago
Databricks CommunityGenerative AI

New Agentic AI Ecosystem in Databricks

001mo ago
Databricks CommunityAnnouncements

Announcement | Contextual Policies in Omnigent: Using session state to better govern AI agents

001mo ago
Databricks CommunityMVP Articles

AI Agent Readiness Hierarchy: From Trusted Data to Trusted Autonomy

001mo ago
Databricks CommunityAnnouncements

Announcement | Introducing CustomerLake: The Agentic CDP embedded in Databricks

001mo ago
HackerNews

Databricks AI Agent Genie Code Is No Longer Free. Now You Have to Pay as You Go

40protmaks1mo ago
HackerNews

Databricks AI Agent Genie Code Is No Longer Free. Now You Have to Pay as You Go

20protmaks1mo ago
Databricks CommunityAnnouncements

Announcement | Introducing the Agentic CDP: Built for the AI Era

001mo ago
HackerNews

Benchmarking coding agents on Databricks' multi-million line codebase

--- top comments --- [redmalang] We have an internal proxy (that I've been meaning to open source for ages) that routes all llm usage at our company, which allows us to see data in realtime. Its been fascinating how rapidly Pi has been adopted. Moreover since its pretty hackable, we've been able to automatically aggregate context from pi sessions, which has resulted in Pi efficacy being higher as more people use it, putting in place a interesting virtuous loop. I didn't expect this outcome: for whatever reason I assumed proprietary harnesses fine tuned to work with a companies' models would work better? ps/random aside: there is something slightly off about Pi's edit command, we are planning to investigate this further and patch this as we have quite a few session traces now.. [yodon] I wish they'd do a follow-on post drilling into the impact of the programming language on cost-per-task, specifically looking at cost to complete tasks in mainstream strongly typed languages (eg. C#, TypeScript) vs dynamic languages (eg. Python, JavaScript). Does the additional verbosity of the language help or hurt cost per task? [cpard] This was mostly because Sonnet 5 worked longer and read more to get there, consuming 1.9x more tokens. I have experienced similar behavior between opus and haiku when benchmarking Dara engineering tasks. The “cheaper” model takes many more turns to figure out the task and this is without taking into account other important factors. Another interesting behavior that I observed is that Haiku tended to cheat more maybe because it was having a harder time to find the root cause of the problem. Benchmarking and evaluation of agentic systems is very interesting and if there’s one thing that someone should keep from the Databricks post is how important is for everyone to build and run their own. [anentropic] > the results showed clear clustering of the models and harnesses into 3 capability tiers pretty sure the only thing making that 'clear' is the coloured stripes, if you took that away it'd look like two tiers good result for GLM 5.2 though and Sonnet 5 seems like a waste of time [HarHarVeryFunny] Wow! It's great to see a large-scale real-world benchmark from a user of these tools, as opposed to the the benchmaxxed results from the vendors themselves. Also great to see different harnesses being tested, with considerably different results. Definitely a few surprises here: 1) GLM 5.2 using Pi performs identically in terms of pass rate (~87.5%) to Opus 4.8 high using Claude Code, but significantly cheaper ($1.25 per task vs $2) 2) Absolute best pass rate (90%) was from Opus 4.8 x-high using Pi, beating out Opus 4.8 using Claude Code 3) Pareto frontier performance from any of the models (Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, GLM 2.5) was using Pi rather than native harnesses Apparently Pi used 3x less context than Claude Code, and one takeaway is to use Pi regardless of what model you are using. The other takeaway is that in real-world performance GLM 5.2 is the equal of Opus 4.8 unless you run Opus 4.8 on x-high in which case you can eke out a 2.5% increase in pass rate at the expense of doubling your cost over GLM 5.2

16169tanelpoder1mo ago