Data Quality

Built a Databricks medallion pipeline for NYC Taxi data

Been working on this as a way to get hands-on with Databricks Asset Bundles and Unity Catalog governance. It's a migration of an old on-prem NYC Taxi analytics stack (ClickHouse + Spark + Docker + Terraform) into a proper Bronze/Silver/Gold lakehouse. A few things I focused on: Auto Loader for incremental ingestion, triggered by file arrival Data quality handling that doesn't just drop bad rows — duplicates, zero-distance trips, and reversed fares go into dedicated quarantine tables instead of being silently discarded Databricks Asset Bundles for deploy/orchestration (dev + prod targets) 3 published AI/BI dashboards on top of the Gold layer (fleet ops, finance, compliance) It's intentionally small in scope — meant to demonstrate the lakehouse pattern, not be a production-scale platform. Currently only Green Taxi data; FHV comparison is planned next. Repo: https://github.com/Hamza-Bouali/NYC-DATABRICKS Would love feedback, especially on the Silver-layer data quality rules or the bundle structure open to critique. https://preview.redd.it/ej6hvzrbokph1.png?width=1667&format=png&auto=webp&s=b090b2c5165efcc83fb3f2b5c38ff6ef34c8ef48 https://preview.redd.it/rih9a5sbokph1.png?width=1879&format=png&auto=webp&s=1b85b90608e1b1273da4f8cbb4fa65d9f2c397a7 https://preview.redd.it/kjdor4sbokph1.png?width=1687&format=png&auto=webp&s=677c6194ede0cd01a8630ee98f85d11a5146b410 submitted by /u/No-Pollution-2274 [link] [comments]

Building for Failure: Implementing Data Quality Firewalls in Petabyte-Scale Medallion Architectures

No more UNION ALL-ing all of your SDP pipeline event log tables for monitoring

https://preview.redd.it/3w0j4ss3inoh1.jpg?width=2048&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=50bc79280a546544e8f795947e5af6b211e9596a Hi folks, Databricks PM here - I wanted to share an exciting update that you no longer have to manually publish and combine your pipeline event logs for monitoring across pipelines and workspaces. We just launched the beta for the pipeline events system table (system.lakeflow_pipeline_events_preview.pipeline_events). Key features: All pipeline events (regardless of cluster start) are automatically captured without any manual enablement or maintenance. Events are aggregated in a central system table without requiring any custom aggregation logic. This data is available at close to real time latency (based on our internal testing we achieve a P99 latency of less than 1 minute). An admin can grant a single user access and they can query events for every pipeline in the table. Fine-grained access controls support which scopes the visibility to only the pipelines the user has access to is coming soon. The data remains in the system table even after pipeline deletion and is retained for 13 months. If you want longer retention this is also possible with the configurable retention feature for System Tables. Query ergonomics are better now with the use of VARIANT. Here are some sample queries in case you want to try them out: -- The latest error for each pipeline that has errored in the last 7 days, with the outermost exception. -- The exception chain is ordered with the root cause last, so read element -1 for the root cause. -- On many errors only the first element carries error_class and sql_state. SELECT workspace_id, pipeline_id, event_time, event_type, message, error.exceptions[0].error_class AS exception_error_class, error.exceptions[0].sql_state AS exception_sql_state FROM system.lakeflow_pipeline_events_preview.pipeline_events WHERE level = 'ERROR' AND event_time >= current_timestamp() - INTERVAL 7 DAYS QUALIFY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY workspace_id, pipeline_id ORDER BY event_time DESC) = 1 ORDER BY event_time DESC -- Flow throughput for a specific pipeline SELECT origin.flow_name, date_trunc('HOUR', event_time) AS hour, SUM(variant_get(details, '$.flow_progress.metrics.num_output_rows', 'BIGINT')) AS rows_written FROM system.lakeflow_pipeline_events_preview.pipeline_events WHERE pipeline_id = ' ' AND event_type = 'flow_progress' AND event_time >= current_timestamp() - INTERVAL 7 DAYS GROUP BY origin.flow_name, date_trunc('HOUR', event_time) ORDER BY hour DESC, rows_written DESC -- Data quality: failed expectations by dataset, per update, in the last 1 day SELECT pipeline_id, update_id, origin.dataset_name, expectation.name AS expectation_name, SUM(expectation.failed_records) AS failed_records FROM system.lakeflow_pipeline_events_preview.pipeline_events LATERAL VIEW explode(variant_get(details, '$.flow_progress.data_quality.expectations', 'ARRAY >')) AS expectation WHERE event_type = 'flow_progress' AND event_time >= current_timestamp() - INTERVAL 1 DAY GROUP BY pipeline_id, update_id, origin.dataset_name, expectation.name HAVING SUM(expectation.failed_records) > 0 ORDER BY failed_records DESC; Beyond single queries you can build alerting (using Databricks SQL alerts) and dashboards. We will share a new dashboard template soon - I will update this post once its available. Call outs: This is in beta right now, if you are not opted in we will not capture your event log data. Enablement: Toggle on the “ Lakeflow Pipeline Events System Table ” from the account level preview. Docs are linked here , would love to hear your thoughts on how you will use it or what else you want to see to improve observability! submitted by /u/brickster_123 [link] [comments]

Do UC table tags propagate to billing for Predictive Optimization and Data Quality Monitoring?

Databricks 5 Minute Features: Governance Hub

Check out the Databricks Governance Hub in my latest 5 Minute Features. A one-stop-shop for all your governance needs; Cost Control, Access, Data Quality, AI Usage all in one place! submitted by /u/Remarkable_Rock5474 [link] [comments]

Query works in Databricks SQL but fails through JDBC

I’ve noticed cases where a query runs successfully in the Databricks SQL editor but fails when the exact same query is executed through a JDBC-based application or data quality tool. Has anyone run into this? Was the issue related to query wrapping, session settings, SQL dialect differences, or JDBC driver behavior? How do you usually troubleshoot these cases? submitted by /u/No_Ambition8323 [link] [comments]

SDP-Meta Deep-Dive Demo: Building Data Pipelines at Scale on Databricks (w/ Databricks Sr. Staff FDE)

This s a helpful resource for those building pipelines at scale on Databricks. From the docs: SDP-META is a metadata-driven framework for Lakeflow Spark Declarative Pipelines . Define your Bronze and Silver pipelines in a JSON or YAML onboarding file — a single generic Declarative Pipeline reads the resulting DataflowSpec at runtime and builds the full processing graph automatically. No pipeline code to write. Who it's for: platform and data engineering teams standardizing repeatable Bronze/Silver pipelines across many datasets — onboarding new feeds through metadata instead of new pipeline code, with consistent data quality, quarantine, CDC, clustering, and sink patterns available through Bundles, CLI, UI, MCP, and agent workflows. When it's not the best fit: one or two simple pipelines, Gold-layer business modeling, tables that each need unique application logic, a managed connector and downstream logic that already satisfy the complete Bronze/Silver requirement, or a need for a formal support SLA (SDP-META is a Databricks Labs project). See the Introduction for the full positioning. You can find the project at https://github.com/databrickslabs/sdp-meta submitted by /u/JosueBogran [link] [comments]

Best practices for data quality in lakeflow

DQX Forge - Extension for DQX in Databricks

Hey guys, i'm just launched a VsCode extension for Data Quality proccess using DQX. The idea is simplify the process using AI (you can do it manually to). The extension construct data contracts, jobs and dashboards, all of that with few clicks and with less than 10 minutes. If you can, please, test and send me a feedback, so i can improve that. You can download directly in VsCode Extensions Marketplace, or https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=arthurfr23.dqx-forge https://preview.redd.it/peasj2p0ajkh1.png?width=3418&format=png&auto=webp&s=4b2b9c9dd3ca68c65a3c45fd08a6e793396d5dff submitted by /u/Significant-Side-578 [link] [comments]

Data quality Lineage Root cause analysis

Data Quality Dashbaord - I have a requirement to build a custom designed quality dashboard in dbx

Pipelines - how are you handling significant schema changes?

Hello - Right now with pipelines you can set things up so you can gracefully handle column additions and safe type conversions (more general type to more specific type). For things like column removals or downcasting, even the most liberal schema evolution setting will throw a failure and require the user manually triage by doing a full reload. I get why this is being done and I agree with the overall philosophy. We should lean on planning and communication because signifiant schema changes mean there is likely an impact downstream and/or to do data quality/meaning. But...... that means we have breaking changes that need to be triaged. In a scenario where we have separate Ops teams potentially operating in a different country, that means we would need to do "staged" failure and reprocessing of the various pipelines. EX: major change in pipeline A means it breaks and requires a full refresh. But A feeds B which feeds C which feeds D. In some situations, that means staged triaging of those expected failures (fix A, then fix B, then fix C, then fix D) - which means labor and perceived extended downtime. - How is everyone managing those kinds of situations? - Is there any possibility of ever setting the pipeline objects to allow for any form of schema change - falling back to a full load as a "last resort" so things auto-heal? (I get why this is not a great option, but at some point this feels like what we'd do manually anyway) Thank you!

When Spark Fails Silently: A JSON Parsing issue

One of the things I really appreciate about the **Databricks Community** is that it surfaces real-world edge cases you don’t usually find in documentation or tutorials. Some time ago, I came across an interesting discussion there involving a JSON parsing issue in **Apache Spark**. At first glance, everything looked straightforward - valid JSON, well-defined fields, no obvious data quality problems. And yet, Spark was returning a DataFrame with nulls. # The Case: When Valid JSON Still Breaks Spark The JSON structure in question looked roughly like this: * A **root array** * Containing **arrays of objects** * Each object representing a sensor state with attributes and timestamps In other words: **an array of arrays of structs**. [ [ { "entity_id": "sensor.solaredge_lifetime_energy", "state": "19848848.0", "attributes": { "state_class": "total", "unit_of_measurement": "Wh", "device_class": "energy", "friendly_name": "solaredge Lifetime energy" }, "last_changed": "2025-12-14T23:00:00+00:00", "last_updated": "2025-12-14T23:00:00+00:00" }, { ... } ], [ ... ] ] The user had defined an explicit schema and used Spark’s JSON reader in multiline mode -and Spark still produced an empty result set, without errors or warnings. Spark is tricky here because nothing actually breaks - it just fails quietly in the background. # Why This Happens The root cause here is a subtle detail in how Spark’s DataFrameReader handles JSON. Spark’s JSON reader is fundamentally designed around the idea that the input represents a **JSON object** at the root level. When that assumption holds, schema inference (or applying an explicit schema) works as expected. In this case, however, the JSON file does **not** start with a JSON object - it starts with a **JSON array**. More specifically, it’s an array whose elements are *themselves arrays* of objects. That difference matters. To illustrate: if the same content were wrapped inside a root-level object, Spark would have no trouble inferring the schema. For example, rewriting the file like this: { "data": [ [ { "entity_id": "sensor.solaredge_lifetime_energy", "state": "19848848.0", "attributes": { "state_class": "total", "unit_of_measurement": "Wh", "device_class": "energy", "friendly_name": "solaredge Lifetime energy" }, "last_changed": "2025-12-14T23:00:00+00:00", "last_updated": "2025-12-14T23:00:00+00:00" }, { "entity_id": "sensor.solaredge_lifetime_energy", "state": "19849120.0", "attributes": { "state_class": "total", "unit_of_measurement": "Wh", "device_class": "energy", "friendly_name": "solaredge Lifetime energy" }, "last_changed": "2025-12-14T23:15:00+00:00", "last_updated": "2025-12-14T23:15:00+00:00" }, { "entity_id": "sensor.solaredge_lifetime_energy", "state": "19849580.0", "attributes": { "state_class": "total", "unit_of_measurement": "Wh", "device_class": "energy", "friendly_name": "solaredge Lifetime energy" }, "last_changed": "2025-12-14T23:30:00+00:00", "last_updated": "2025-12-14T23:30:00+00:00" } […truncated]

The next generation of Databricks Genie just launched. Here is what data engineers actually need to know.

I have been following Genie since it first launched with AI/BI last year. Back then, I honestly thought it was mostly for business users. A chatbot on top of your data that could answer basic questions in plain English. Useful, but not something I thought data engineers really needed to care much about. After seeing the new 2026 version, I completely changed my mind. Genie is no longer just a business chatbot. The biggest change is Genie Code, which is basically an AI agent designed for data professionals. It can generate pipelines, debug failures, create dashboards, monitor systems, and work directly with Lakeflow and Unity Catalog. That part caught my attention immediately because it moves beyond simple Q&A and starts touching actual engineering workflows. What surprised me most is how connected the whole system has become. It can pull context from dashboards, Genie Spaces, apps, metadata, documentation, and external systems like GitHub, Jira, and Confluence through MCP. Instead of only searching tables, it tries to understand relationships across the environment. That feels very different from the first version. The operational side is also interesting. Genie Code can monitor pipelines, investigate failures, help with DBR upgrades, and respond to issues before teams even notice them. The more I read about it, the more it felt less like a chatbot and more like an assistant sitting beside the engineering team. But honestly, the biggest takeaway for me is not the AI itself. It is what this means for data engineers. A lot of people immediately jump to “AI will replace data engineers,” but I think the opposite is happening. These systems are only as good as the data foundation underneath them. If metadata is incomplete, if tables are messy, if naming conventions are inconsistent, or if documentation is missing, the AI layer will give poor answers confidently. That means clean data modeling, governance, metadata, documentation, and data quality are becoming even more important than before. The engineers building those foundations become more valuable, not less. I think the role is slowly shifting away from spending hours writing repetitive boilerplate transformations and more toward building trustworthy, AI-ready data systems. One thing I keep noticing while learning Databricks through BricksNotes and the wider community is that the platform is moving very quickly toward AI-native data engineering. Features like Unity Catalog, Lakeflow, and now Genie all connect together. It feels like understanding metadata and governance is becoming just as important as understanding Spark itself. Also interesting that Genie now has a full mobile experience on iOS and Android. Business users can access dashboards, apps, and chat directly from their phones, which means the underlying data quality matters even more because people are going to depend on these systems everywhere, not only during work hours. Curious if anyone here is already using Genie or Genie Code in production. I would genuinely like to hear how the answer quality has been and whether your teams are changing how they approach metadata and documentation because of it.

Three MCPs, One Answer: Building a Data Quality Monitor on Databricks Apps

Tips for integrating data quality tests?

I've been brought on as a data engineering consultant for a small to mid-sized company who has a poorly built architecture in Databricks. There's currently no documentation or clear architecture, so I've been spending weeks trying to untangle everything. They now want me to start implementing data quality checks because as of now there's no testing within the process at all and they're unsure if their outputs are even correct. Currently the data they want me to test are just raw files uploaded into Databricks tables on an irregular schedule, all with different granularity and logic that will require more complex checks than just null checks and unique primary keys. What is the best starting point for this? They have jobs and jobs that run jobs but no pipelines established, and I don't think I have the power to change that yet, so I think that takes DLT off the table unless I can prove it's worth the refactor. My first thought was integrating pyspark testing scripts to run within the jobs, but there has to be a more sophisticated way to do this?

The learning order that actually works for Databricks. I wasted 3 months before figuring this out.

I want to share something that I wish someone told me when I started learning Databricks because it would have saved me months of confusion. When I first opened Databricks, I did what most people do. I went straight to PySpark because every tutorial said that is what data engineers use. I spent weeks trying to understand RDDs, DataFrames, transformations, actions, lazy evaluation, and the DAG all at once. I could follow along with the instructor but the moment I opened a blank notebook I had no idea where to start. Then I took a step back and tried something different. I started with SQL. Databricks runs SQL natively. I already knew SQL from a previous job. Within an hour I was querying tables, running aggregations, building views. I felt productive for the first time in weeks. That confidence changed everything. Here is the order that worked for me and I genuinely believe it works for most people. Start with SQL on existing tables. Databricks has sample datasets built in. Run SELECT statements. Do GROUP BY. Write JOINs. Get comfortable navigating data. If you already know SQL from any database this stage takes a few days not weeks. Then learn Delta Lake through SQL. Create tables. Insert data. Update rows. Delete rows. Run DESCRIBE HISTORY and see the transaction log. Run SELECT VERSION AS OF and experience time travel. This is where Databricks starts to feel different from other databases. Every table you create is automatically a Delta table so you get versioning, schema enforcement, and ACID transactions without configuring anything. Then move to PySpark DataFrames. Now that you understand what the data looks like and how Delta tables work, PySpark makes way more sense. You understand what df.filter does because you already did WHERE in SQL. You understand what df.groupBy does because you already did GROUP BY. Lazy evaluation clicks faster because you have context for what the transformations are actually doing. Then build pipelines. Take what you learned and chain it together. Read from a source. Transform. Write to a Delta table. Schedule it. Monitor it. This is where Lakeflow (the new name for Delta Live Tables) comes in. But it makes no sense if you skip the previous steps. Then governance. Unity Catalog, permissions, data quality expectations. This feels like admin work when you learn it in isolation but once you have built a pipeline you understand exactly why it matters. The mistake I made was trying to learn PySpark before I understood the data model. I was writing code without knowing what it produced. Once I started with SQL and built up from there everything fell into place faster. One more thing. If you are on Free Edition you do not need to configure clusters. It is serverless. If a tutorial tells you to create a cluster and choose a runtime version that tutorial was written for Community Edition which no longer exists. Just open a notebook and start writing code. Hope this helps someone who is feeling overwhelmed right now. Happy to answer any questions in the comments.

cant apend results of streaming group by agregations

Hi, I'm relatively new to Databricks. I have a medallion architecture with the following components: \- cor\_project (catalog) \- bronze (schema) \- raw\_swell\_metrics (table) \- data (volume) \- landing \- checkpoints \- raw\_swell\_metrics \- silver (schema) \- swell\_metrics (table) \- quarantine\_swell\_metrics (table) \- data (volume) \- checkpoints \- swell\_metrics \- quarantine\_swell\_metrics \- gold (schema) \- wave\_daily\_summary (table) \- data (volume) \- checkpoints \- wave\_daily\_summary The flow is as follows: Add file(s) to bronze.data.landing -> manually execute job -> read only new file(s) and add them to bronze.raw\_swell\_metrics -> read only new rows in bronze.raw\_swell\_metrics (transform and data quality) and add them to swell\_metrics or quarantine\_swell\_metrics -> read only new rows in silver.swell\_metrics (transform) and add them to gold.wave\_daily\_summary. The data is uploaded every month with a new file. The data is flowing correctly from landing to silver.swell\_metrics It fails when I'm transforming it to gold. Code: df_silver_swell_metrics = (     spark.readStream         .format("delta")         .table(f"cor_project.silver.swell_metrics") ) df_silver_swell_metrics_transformed = (     df_silver_swell_metrics     .groupBy(         F.date_trunc("day", "datetime").alias("day"),         "coast_name"     ).agg(         F.max("wave_height_m").alias("max_wave_height_m"),         F.expr("max_by(wave_period_s, wave_height_m)").alias("max_wave_period_s"),         F.expr("max_by(wave_direction_deg, wave_height_m)").alias("max_wave_direction_deg"),         F.expr("max_by(wind_speed_ms, wave_height_m)").alias("max_wave_wind_speed_ms"),         F.expr("max_by(wind_direction_deg, wave_height_m)").alias("max_wave_wind_direction_deg"),         F.min("wave_height_m").alias("min_wave_height_m"),         F.expr("min_by(wave_period_s, wave_height_m)").alias("min_wave_period_s"),         F.expr("min_by(wave_direction_deg, wave_height_m)").alias("min_wave_direction_deg"),         F.expr("min_by(wind_speed_ms, wave_height_m)").alias("min_wave_wind_speed_ms"),         F.expr("min_by(wind_direction_deg, wave_height_m)").alias("min_wave_wind_direction_deg"),         F.avg("wave_height_m").alias("avg_wave_height_m")     ) ) df_gold_wave_daily_summary = (     df_silver_swell_metrics_transformed     .select(         F.col("day").alias("date"),         F.col("coast_name"),         F.col("max_wave_height_m").cast("float"),         F.col("max_wave_period_s").cast("float"),         F.col("max_wave_direction_deg").cast("float"),         F.col("max_wave_wind_speed_ms").cast("float"),         F.col("max_wave_wind_direction_deg").cast("float"),         F.col("min_wave_height_m").cast("float"),         F.col("min_wave_period_s").cast("float"),         F.col("min_wave_direction_deg").cast("float"),         F.col("min_wave_wind_speed_ms").cast("float"),         F.col("min_wave_wind_direction_deg").cast("float"),         F.col("avg_wave_height_m").cast("float")     ) ) (     df_gold_wave_daily_summary.writeStream         .format("delta")         .trigger(availableNow=True)         .option("checkpointLocation", f"/Volumes/cor_{ambiente}/gold/data/checkpoints/wave_daily_summary")         .toTable(f"cor_project.gold.wave_daily_summary") ) This generates the following error: [STREAMING_OUTPUT_MODE.UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION] Invalid streaming output mode: append. This output mode is not supported for streaming aggregations without watermark on streaming DataFrames/DataSets. SQLSTATE: 42KDE I have tried including F.watermark it works, but doesn't load the records for the last day. Any idea how to solve it? Thanks for any advice

How do you reframe data engineering for a CEO who thinks it's "data quality oversight"?

Data Quality on Databricks design

Hey, i am deciding between DQX and Deequ for data quality on Databricks, or even to use them both, i think Deequ is amazing because of AnomalyCheck which let us compare batch to batch and make the data flow consistently over time which is very under appreciated, while DQX is amazing at the row level detection. How did u design your data quality on Databricks? I was thinking using DQX for in-transit Data Quality checks for hard fails, while Deequ for AnomalyCheck for observartion/dashboards/notifications.

HOW TO: [DBT Local] Elementary Anomaly Tests Custom Thresholds

Elementary is a tool that focus on data quality for dbt models. One of the data quality test it has is -- anomaly detection https://docs.elementary-data.com/data-tests/how-anomaly-detection-works I am implementing freshness anomaly tests for my model: https://docs.elementary-data.com/data-tests/anomaly-detection-tests/freshness-anomalies , and wanted to add custom thresholds so I can know when the test result is a warning VS. an error (by default, it will all be considered warnings) Below's what I tried: 1.1 and 2.8 are values I find by: looking at the past anomaly score for the table from a table called 'metrics_anomaly_score' that is generated while dbt test runs from the past anomaly scores, find the 85th percentile which is 1.1, 98th percentile which is 2.8, and use them as warn VS. error threshold tests: - elementary.freshness_anomalies: timestamp_column: "CAST(xxxx AS TIMESTAMP)" time_bucket: period: day count: 1 tags: ["elementary", "anomaly"] config: severity: "error" warn_if: ">1.1" error_if: ">2.8" However, after running dbt job in databricks I see this in the log: 14:40:16 Failure in test elementary_source_freshness_anomalies_xxxx_CAST_xxxx_at_AS_TIMESTAMP_ (models/sources/XXX/XXX.yml) 14:40:16 Got 3 results, configured to fail if >2.8 I analyzed and noticed that it is not using 2.8 as anomaly score, rather, it is using it as the number of anomalies the test found from all buckets. For example, this test splits the data to multiple buckets and will decide if each bucket is an anomaly, among all the buckets, if there are more than 2.8 buckets that are anomalies, it will fail the test -- this is how it interprets the threshold, which is not what I wanted. (but let me know if this is better than the percentile method I was thinking initially) So I want to ask the experienced dbt developers, have you met this situation when you need to define a threshold for your elementary anomaly tests to […truncated]

Databricks pipeline fails on execute python script for expectations with error: Update FAILES; _UNCLASSIFIED_PYTHON_COMMAND_ERROR

I'm working on a databricks pipelibe and trying to create and apply expectations on a pipeline. I have the code but I keep getting an error that I cannot resolve.There is not much to go on, but I keep trying different methods, resoving all the errors and end up with the same error and I don't really understand what is going wrong. I've checked if it's a premission issue, I havve tried displaing the table and that works fine. In the pipeline view I should be able to see my expectaion but because it does not work it's not showing. The error is: be7a33 update is FAILES. Error class:_UNCLASSIFIED_PYTHON_COMMAND_ERROR %python from pyspark.sql.functions import col from pyspark import pipelines as dp @dp.table( name="orders", comment="Orders table with data quality constraints" ) @dp.expect_all_or_fail( "expect_table_row_count_to_be_between", "COUNT(*) > 100", "customer_id_not_null", "customer_id IS NOT NULL", "expect_column_values_to_be_in_set", "currency IN ('USD', 'EUR', 'GBP')" ) def orders(): return dp.read("Xyntrel_bronze.bronze.orders").filter( col("customer_id").isNotNull() ) I don't understand because the parser says the code is correct but on execution I get a fail. "timestamp": "2025-12-10T09:13:32.863Z", "message": "Update be7a33 is FAILED.", "level": "ERROR", "error": { "exceptions": [ { "message": "", "error_class": "_UNCLASSIFIED_PYTHON_COMMAND_ERROR", "short_message": "" } ], "fatal": true }, "details": { "update_progress": { "state": "FAILED" } }, "event_type": "update_progress", "maturity_level": "STABLE"}